Social Invention Group

Complexity Science Inspired Consulting~Coaching~Teaching~Facilitating
Home
Liberating Structures
LS Menu
FAQs
LS Principles
Mash-Ups
The LS Book
Marquee Projects
About Us
Working With Us
Graphic Facilitation
Improvisation
Selected Papers
Strategy Workshops
Presentations
Key Links
Clients
What Is New...
Site Map
Gallery & Aesthetics
Contact Us
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions about Liberating Structures

 

What are Liberating Structures [LS]?

Thirty-three (and growing) easy-to-learn, adaptable methods that make it quick and simple for groups of people of any size to radically change how they interact and work together, and thus how they address issues, solve problems and develop opportunities.

 


What happens when Liberating Structures are put into action?

Including and unleashing nearly everyone with LS: improves decisions; boosts innovation; accelerates and improves the quality of implementation; and, enables rapid adjustments to change. LS answer the question “how can we engage the ‘vast majority’ practically and cost-effective?” with many new ways of working together. 

 

Three big beneftis include:

  • everyone in your group or unit can move rapidly from novice-to-skilled innovator

  • novices make contributions much bigger and better than predicted by experts

  • including everyone makes it simple to implement, spread, & sustain innovations


Why Liberating Structures?

Organizations operate mostly top-down and this is reflected in the way “working together” is usually organized. Participation in meetings is restricted and often standardized. Agendas and discussions are controlled by a few. Meeting formats and designs tend to be nearly always the same and dominated by PowerPoint presentations followed by managed discussions. Decisions made during these meetings depend for their implementation on the “vast majority” who were not included in the process. Organizations that use LS have instead access to a variety of methods for including their “vast majority.”

 


What traditional top-down assumptions do Liberating Structures challenge?

Two implicit assumptions underpin top down traditions:

·         the “vast majority” have nothing to contribute that could make a significant difference (i.e. bottom-up is useless);

·         the “vast majority” will be willing (i.e. will offer no resistance) and capable of rapidly and effectively implementing decisions from which it was excluded.

We all know those assumptions are not valid. Therefore, huge opportunities exist for organizations that find ways to effectively and authentically engage their “vast majority” (including in many cases customers). This is precisely what LS do and, frequently, formal leaders are relieved, delighted and surprised by the opportunities that open up with LS use.

 

 


What keeps Liberation from turning into chaos?

Liberating Structures literally liberate groups and their energy, and this freedom combined with appropriate structures, allows them to tap into their collective intelligence and creativity. The “Structure” prescribes in detail a sequence of group interactions with a step by step process. For instance, one structured step could be as simple as “spend fifteen minutes in groups of five developing a list of all the activities required for doing a XYZ”. While the “Structures” impose constraints that focus group attention and purpose, their other main role is to enable all participants who are affected by an issue to engage in conversation. This creates real possibilities for developing bottom-up proposals and actions. Enabling and constraining are complementary.

 


How does more Structure Liberate?

The Structure side of LS is that they make it easy -- and safe -- for all participants to express their views freely and fully. There is no control on the content of group conversations. Instead results emerge bottom-up from the whole set of interactions “liberated” by LS. A minimum structure liberates the maximum freedom to explore solutions.

 


Are Liberating Structures difficult to learn?

NO! However they need to be experienced at least once to understand and believe what they can achieve. LS are as subtle and simple as they are powerful. They are also counterintuitive in a culture dominated by the logic of top-down organizing and control. Fortunately a practical understanding of most individual LS methods can be developed in less than one hour, enough to go out and try them without much risk. Workshop participants act their way into new thinking rather than thinking their way into new acting. In the end, of course, deeper learning has to come from practice.


 

What is the impact of using Liberating Structures?

LS stimulate and unleash innovation and productivity at all levels. Across diverse roles and disciplines, participants use LS to invent creative ways of working together with colleagues and customers.

 


How are LS different than other management approaches?

LS are not best practices imposed on a whole organization; they do not rely on expensive and lengthy efforts to train people in an attempt to change their behaviors. They are instead a set of simple methods from which individuals/groups can choose what suits their likes and dislikes then mix-and-match them flexibly to address their challenges.  Mash-ups are encouraged.

 


What is the best way to learn to use LS?

A 2-3 day immersion workshop followed by brief one-on-one coaching sessions is the most effective approach. In very rapid cycles, a “do one, teach one” learning method is employed.

 


Who should be included in a LS workshop?

A diverse mix of leaders, managers and front line colleagues from the same organization or with shared interests. Up to 150 participants can learn the approaches together. LS are about working together and they are best learned together.

 


What are key elements of a workshop?

A three-day immersion workshop may feature the following themes and methods. Each session is co-designed with clients and customized to address key innovation challenges & opportunities.

 

 

DAY I

 

DAY II

 

DAY III

 

Impromptu Networking

Focusing on People & Purpose

 

Agreement-and-Certainty Matching Matrix

Matching Simple, Complicated, & Complex Approaches to Specific Challenges

 

Making Space with TRIZ
Designing a Perfectly Adverse System to Make Space for Innovation

 

Café Conversation Dialogue
Making Sense of and Forming Consensual Hunches about Big Challenges

Appreciative Interviews
Creating Momentum by Building On and Designing With “What Works Now”

 

1-2-4 Progressive, Rapid Cycle Conversation
Conversing in Rapid-Cycles:: Self-Reflection, Pairs, and Small Group

 

Five Whys
Becoming Clear About Purpose

 

Ecocycle Planning
Engaging Groups in Growing and Sifting Their Portfolio of Activities

 

 

Min Specs
Unleashing Innovation & Action by Specifying Only “Must-do’s” & “Must-not-do’s”

 

Wicked Questions
Framing a Paradoxical Challenge That Engages Everyone’s Imagination

 

Design Party Debrief
Reflecting on Your Design-In-Progress and Making Adjustments-As-You-Go


Discovery & Action Dialogue  (Positive Deviance)
Discovering Solutions To Big Challenges In Plain Sight


Chunking – User Research & Rapid Prototyping
Tapping Tacit and Latent Knowledge in Seriously-Playful Rapid Cycles


Panarchy

Spreading Your Innovation or Good Idea At Many Scales Simultaneously

 

Fishbowl Conversations: What I Need From You
Surfacing and Working Improvisationally Through Shared Challenges

 

 

Wise Crowds Consultation
Tapping the “Wisdom of Crowds” To Solve Problems Together


Graphic StoryBoarding
Illustrating and Detailing a Design Process for Key Meetings

 

Generative Relationships
Understanding Patterns that Create Surprising, New Sources of Value

 

Scenario Planning
Preparing and Practicing Strategy-Making for Surprising-Yet-Plausible Futures

 

Smart Networks
Weaving Social Connections and Informal Networks To Advance Practice

 

Open Space Technology
Liberating Action and Leadership In Large Groups

 

Integrated~Autonomy

Amplifying Attributes that Make You Always and Never the Same

 

15% Solutions
Noticing the Influence, Discretion and Power Individuals Have Right Now

…………………………………………..

DAY  IV &  DAY V

1-To-1  Coaching Sessions

 

 

With so many methods, what are the common characteristics of LS?

Like all methods for working together LS are mixtures of control and freedom. In this case, the emphasis is on achieving maximum freedom for participation. Thus, the “structures” are the minimum possible to achieve maximum engagement. They are all very simple, easy to implement & learn. They are forgiving; perfection is not required to achieve benefits. Every LS invites all voices, promotes self-discovery, & generates shared ownership of decisions/actions.

 


Why so many methods, so fast?

·         To provoke a “surprise of discovery” that LS are useful for a very wide range of challenges

·         To ensure that every person is likely to find two or three methods they like and can start using immediately

·         To help participants gain confidence through many experiences on diverse issues

·         To show how new ideas and answers repeatedly emerge bottom-up

·         To discover how LS methods are modular and can be mashed-up easily & very quickly

·         To demonstrate by using them quickly can generate great results without tight fidelity

 


Why include top & front-line together?

Complex issues involve multiple functions, levels, & disciplines. Adopting new methods of working together requires the involvement of multiple layers, engaging all relevant stakeholders regardless of their formal position. Learning together provides the platform for discovering how working together using LS generate surprising outcomes. Learning together also builds the platform for launching LS quickly through the organization. Confidence builds when everyone starts on an equal footing and there is no waiting for permission.

 


Since Liberating Structures are not imposed, how do they spread?

The contagion starts with the initial LS workshop where participants invariably have a lot of fun experiencing the various methods. This has been the case in all countries regardless of the differences in culture. Long rounds of applause are a frequent occurrence at the end of the workshops. Since the workshop uses actual challenges from the participants as case material for the sessions interesting results are generated as LS are being introduced for the first time. The “fun” continues at work where using LS is neither complicated nor a lengthy time-consuming process. Newcomers learn from being included in a work experience and get attracted by the same elements of fun and surprising results. Because LS are effective for addressing entangled and chronic problems, they attract attention and broad participation.

 


How are users changing and localizing Liberating Structures?

LS methods can easily be mixed-and-matched creatively to fit local challenges. This increases dramatically the range of situations that can be addressed. Just as what can be accomplished with a pair of pliers, a knife and a hammer combined goes well beyond what each tool can do alone, so it is with LS where the number of permutations available with 33 methods is obviously huge. Like open source initiatives, LS attract diverse participation (often bottom-up and fringe-in), cross boundaries easily, quickly build on serendipity, and create new possibilities. When embraced, the approaches invite creative adaptation and spontaneously order themselves.

 


What challenges are being addressed with LS?

The challenges presented to us by workshop participants during the 1-on-1 consulting sessions have ranged from strategic to personal issues. Examples include: re-making mundane-yet-boring meetings; introducing a new product; making personnel decisions; training sales organizations; exploring new strategies in tough markets; shifting from a product to a customer orientation; inviting customers to co-develop new ways to succeed together; redesigning management meetings; dealing with the consequences of reorganizations or downsizing; resolving organizational conflicts; mergers of two distinct organizations. The more familiar people become with LS the more opportunities they discover opportunities to use them.

 


How are changes arising from using LS sustained?

Self-organizing attributes help make solutions that emerge from using Liberating Structures sustainable and self-spreading. People learn and implement best when they discover solutions themselves, among peers in their local context. Resistance to change evaporates because ownership is shared.

 


How do LS fit with other change management and lean initiatives?

Users report that LS are complementary to technical, expert-centered methods. LS can add momentum to efforts that have stalled or reached limits. LS methods cultivate ownership beyond typical programs that promote participation.

 


What problems do Liberating Structures solve?

For a large class of management challenges, too few people are included in planning and coordinating a response. Engaging more people at multiple levels, earlier and more strategically, can dramatically boost capacity for solutions that generate spectacular and unexpected results. Clients have actively engaged their customers using LS. In turn, customers often want to learn LS for use in their own work.

 


What should leaders who bring Liberating Structures to their organization be prepared for?

Using LS the first time around can be unnerving for leaders. LS require from them to willingly let go of control. Fortunately benefits become quickly visible (as early as during the workshop) thus providing reassuring evidence that letting go of control was a responsible choice. LS are especially attractive to leaders who are frustrated with traditional approaches, are curious to apply innovative methods and are comfortable working with ambiguity.

 


What are the origins of Liberating Structures?

Building on a few methods introduced in EdgeWare in 1998, LS draw from emerging insights from complexity science, organizational development, and user experience. Keith McCandless and Henri Lipmanowicz have partnered with clients to develop and advance LS starting in 2003.

 


Where have LS methods been tested?

Starting in 2003, LS was first developed and tested in Latin America. More recently, workshops have been held in Europe, Canada and the US. Organizational settings include: multi-national business, hospitals, government, schools and non-profit NGO organizations.

 


Why do they work?

LS are more unit-based and local, with solutions worked out by front-line groups instead of imported “best practices.” LS grow through informal social networks and decentralized communities-of-practice rather than the organizational chart via buy in initiatives. LS are practical, simple, and ready to be adapted in everyday settings without additional education, training or certification. LS are inspired by complexity science. Complexity science focuses attention on the pattern of relationships and small local changes that can make a big difference.

 


What is special about our approach with Liberating Structures?

Unique synergies arise from combining the following elements:

·         A large collection of simple and practical self-organizing methods

·         An immersive 3-day workshop design that makes it possible for a large group of co-workers to experience and internalize many methods very quickly

·         Inclusion of all organizational levels (top to frontline) in the LS workshop

·         The personal experience of jointly shaping wise responses to current-complex issues

·         The one-on-one consulting sessions that immediately follow the workshop and help participants move right away from learning to implementation

 

 

 

Combined, these elements make it possible for an organization to start rapid cycles of experimentation that can launch and sustain a transformation.  Everyone is included and unleashed.  Innovations bubble up from every corner of the organization.